Kitt v. Home Indemnity Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Was a directed verdict for the defendant proper under the evidence presented?
Claims of nonliability under insurance contracts are not favored by the courts; and this court on several occasions has refused to declare policies of insurance avoided because of a change in status of the insured property or the insured.
Thus, in West v. Citizens’ Ins. Co., 27 Ohio St., 1, 22 Am. Rep., 294, the holding was that a policy of insurance issued to a mercantile partnership on a stock of goods owned by the firm, which contained no provision limiting or restricting alienation of the property, was not avoided…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Home Indemnity Co. v. Village of PlymouthOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Hagan v. Scottish InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Black v. AlberyOhio Supreme Court · 1914
- Southern Underwriters v. LookadooCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Chavers v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960
- Hagen v. J. C. Penney Casualty InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Heil v. United Ohio Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Allstate Insurance v. BaileysDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.