Legal Opinion

Paul v. Eggman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1966No. Civ. No. 566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMURRAY, J. pro tem.*

This is an appeal from an injunction enjoining appellant from certain activities alleged to be in violation of sections 784 and 796.2 of the Agricultural Code of the State of California. The appeal is based on an agreed statement of facts which appears as follows:

On April 13, 1965, the plaintiff, Charles Paul, as Director of Agriculture of the State of California, brought this action for civil penalties and injunctive relief against the defendant, Garlan Eggman, for violating chapter 2, division 5, of the Agricultural Code of California, and particularly, sections 784…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Department of Mental Hygiene v. KirchnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGlothlen v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. McGlothlen v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API