Housing Authority of East St. Louis v. Kosydor
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer
This is an appeal from a judgment in an eminent domain proceeding instituted by the Housing Authority of East St. Louis. The most important issue is whether the defendants, George and Raymond Kosydor, were properly allowed to recover under their cross-petition the expense of moving their equipment and merchandise. In addition to a verdict of $113,000 for the land taken, the jury returned a verdict awarding the defendants $27,000 for the costs of removing their personalty. Judgment was entered upon both verdicts, and the plaintiff has appealed.
We consider first the alleged errors relating to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- City of Chicago v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- City of Chicago v. Harrison-Halsted Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. BucklesIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Lombard Park District v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- People v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Trustees of Schools of Township No. 42 v. SchroederIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Department of Transportation v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.