Legal Opinion

Ervin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided June 6, 1884PublishedCited by 20 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

The principal questions raised by the demurrers to this bill are whether the Oregon Steam Navigation Company is not an indispensable party whose absence renders the bill defective, and whether tho bill states a cause of action in equity. The substantive allegations of the bill are that at the time the several transactions complained of took place the complainants were stockholders of the Oregon Steam Navigation Company, a corporation of the state of Oregon; that in 1879 that company had a capital of $5,000,000, divided into 50,000 shares, was prosperous, owned large properties, and had a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hatch v. DanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Brewer v. Proprietors of the Boston TheatreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Clarke v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  4. Ribon v. Railroad CompaniesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Heath v. Erie Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jones v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Wheeler v. Abilene Nat. Bank Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  3. In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
  4. Watts v. VanderbiltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. McClean v. BradleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API