Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Hillsborough County Hospital Authority

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 27, 1996No. 90-120-CIV-T-25BPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*692 ORDER

ADAMS, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. 247) to which Defendants have voiced their strong opposition (Dkts. 252, 253). Upon review of the pleadings and the attachments thereto, the Court concludes that class certification is appropriate for the reasons set forth below.

The task of determining if class action certification is appropriate, requires on one hand, that the court conduct a rigorous analysis before certification. General Tel Co. of the Southwest v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147, 160-61, 102 S.Ct. 2364, 2372, 72 L.Ed.2d 740…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Richard JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Albert Kornberg and Laura Kornberg v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. TCI Cablevision of Dallas, Inc. v. Owens, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
  3. In Re Polypropylene Carpet Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1997
  4. Compaq Computer Corp. v. Lapray, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
  5. Miller v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API