Legal Opinion

Simmonds v. State Employees' Retirement System

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 1997No. 43, 44 M.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This appeal presents the issue of whether an individual enrolled in a residency program in a state university medical center is a “state employee” for purposes of receiving service credit pursuant to the State Employees’ Retirement Code (Code), 71 Pa.C.S. § 5101, et seq. For the reasons set forth herein, we hold that medical residents are not state employees and are therefore ineligible to purchase state credit for time spent in a residency program.

From July 1, 1980, through June 30, 1981, Dr. Mary A. Simmonds, Appellee, served at the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Ass'n of Interns & Residents v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Christiana v. Public School Employes' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Kapilian v. System Employes' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. McKeesport Hospital v. Pennsylvania State Board of MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Welsh v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Chuk v. State Employees' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Donovan v. State Employes' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Davis v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. M.J. Schneider v. PA PSERBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API