Legal Opinion

Scharringhausen v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 29, 2009No. Case 06cv2167PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION OF PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the United States of America’s (“defendant”) Motion to Dismiss Robert M. Scharringhausen’s (“plaintiff’) First Cause of Action of the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Defendant argues that plaintiffs first cause of action must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiffs first cause of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanna v. Internal Revenue Services (IRS)District Court, S.D. California · 2025
  2. Hanna v. Internal Revenue Services (IRS)District Court, S.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API