Legal Opinion
Jensen v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 1977PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division modified to strike the remand for determination of damages, and otherwise affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.
The applicable principle has been well stated by Mr. Justice Arthur D. Brennan in Roer Constr. Corp. v City of New Rochelle (207 Misc 46, 51): "[W]here, as here, the city has, without the payment of any compensation therefor, deprived the plaintiff of the use and enjoyment of all of its lands for a period of indefinite duration, the resolution and official map affecting such deprivation constitute an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fred F. French Investing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Headley v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Roer Construction Corp. v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Fred F. French Investing Co. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Urbanizadora Versalles, Inc. v. Miguel A. Rivera RiosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. Comm'n v. ChadwickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Scarpuzza v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Q.C. Construction Co. v. GalloDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.