Legal Opinion
United States v. Bolden
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 24, 2003No. 02-6249PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
On July 10, 2002, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma disqualified the entire office of the United States Attorney for the Western District of Oklahoma (“USA”) from representing the government on Defendant Gary Lionel Bolden’s motion to compel. The USA’s office immediately appealed the disqualification. Pursuant to the collateral order doctrine under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we take jurisdiction and REVERSE. ' ■
I. Background
On May 5, 1999, a grand jury indicted Mr. Bolden on seven drug-related counts. On July 19, 1999, he entered into a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. WamplerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- State v. BalfourCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- United States v. BascianoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.