Pruitt v. Ray
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The only question involved on this appeal is whether or not- the court below committed error in denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial.
The plaintiff’s contentions were submitted to the jury on a proper issue and in a charge which he concedes to be free from error.
There was no question of law or legal inference involved in the motion lodged below. Consequently it was addressed to the sound discretion of tbe trial judge, whose ruling, in the absence of abuse of discretion, is not reviewable on appeal. No abuse of discretion is shown. G.S. 1-207; Ziglar v,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anderson v. . HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Ziglar v. . ZiglarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Selph v. SelphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- GLEN FOREST CORPORATION v. BenschCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Matter of Will of MaynardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- In Re the Will of HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.