Legal Opinion
Rambus Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 29, 2003No. Nos. 01-1449, 01-1583, 01-1604, 01-1641, 02-1174 and 02-1192PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge PROST.
RADER, Circuit Judge.
During trial, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) and held that Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., and Infineon Technologies Holding North America Inc. (collectively Infineon) did not infringe Rambus Inc.’s patents. The jury later found Rambus liable for fraud associated with standard-setting activities on two computer memory technologies. On post-trial JMOL…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Bradford v. VentoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. William Adderson JarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Rambus Inc. v. ReaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Holiday Matinee, Inc. v. Rambus, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.