Legal Opinion
State v. Larson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 27, 1988No. C2-87-2503PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appellant Judy Marie Larson challenges her DWI conviction under Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(d) (1986) on grounds that the state was required to provide expert testimony relating blood alcohol concentration at the time of testing to concentration at the time of driving, operation or control. We find the conviction lawful and affirm.
FACTS
Appellant was found intoxicated in her parked car. She was tested for blood alcohol concentration level 77 minutes after her discovery and yielded a blood alcohol concentration level of .14. Appellant argues that since no evidence (via…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. LangleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State, City of Mankato v. ChirpichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. McBroomCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State v. GeislerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Bierner v. State, Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. KorhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- State v. ShepardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.