Legal Opinion
State, City of Mankato v. Chirpich
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 12, 1986No. C7-85-2248PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant Richard Chirpich was charged with a gross misdemeanor under Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 3(a) (1984). To simplify the issue of enhancement, both counsel agreed to try the case to the jury on misdemeanor DWI pursuant to an agreement that conviction would automatically become a gross misdemeanor if the jury found appellant guilty.
Appellant was also charged with three separate subdivisions of the Minnesota Statutes on DWI, Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subds. 1(a), 1(d), and 1(e) (1984). The jury acquitted appellant on subdivisions 1(a) and 1(d) but found him guilty of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State v. CredifordWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Appleby v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Bohannon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.