Legal Opinion

Baedke v. John Morrell & Co.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided October 4, 1990No. C88-3114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HANSEN, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant John Morrell & Co.’s resisted motion for partial summary judgment, filed March 2, 1990. The motion asks that this court determine whether Iowa or South Dakota law applies to various issues presented in this matter.

Facts

The facts of this matter are as follows. The parties do not dispute the facts necessary for the resolution of defendant’s motion. Defendant John Morrell is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Ohio. John Morrell does business and operates plants in both Iowa and South Dakota,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Goetzman v. WichernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Heath v. ZellmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Casey v. Manson Construction & Engineering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kegel v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Carborundum Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  2. O'CONNOR v. Busch GardensNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  3. Harlan Feeders, Inc. v. Grand Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  4. ESTATE OF PIGORSCH v. York CollegeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API