Legal Opinion
Geier v. M-Qube Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided January 20, 2016No. C13-354 TSZPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on plaintiffs motion for class certification, docket no. 82. Having reviewed all papers filed in support of, and in opposition to, plaintiffs motion, the Court enters the following order.
Background
This case concerns the practice of “mobile cramming,” which is the practice of “placing unauthorized, misleading, or deceptive charges on a consumer’s telephone bill.” Fed. Trade Comm’n v. Inc21.com Corp., 745 F.Supp.2d 975, 996 (N.D.Cal.2010). At a high level, the cramming industry included three different groups:…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.