Legal Opinion

Judd v. New York & T. S. S. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 12, 1904No. 18PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On Rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in this case brought suit against the defendant for the recovery of damages, resulting to them from the loss by fire of a large amount of wool, stored in the sheds of the defendant while awaiting transportation. The plaintiffs alleged and adduced evidence tending to show negligence on the part of the defendant, in storing this wool in a shed adjoining another shed, not in its ownership or control, containing a large amount of jute, alleged to be exceedingly inflammable, and which, as the shed was an open one, was exposed to the sparks of passing locomotives.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Judd v. New York & T. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fields v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  2. H. C. Judd & Root v. New York & T. S. S. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Montgomery v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  4. Quevedo v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Roy v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API