Ross v. State of Arizona
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
— On December 16, 1938 the defendant was informed ag-ainst by the County Attorney of Maricopa County for criminal libel. He demurred to the information on the grounds (1) that it “does not state facts sufficient to constitute a criminal charge” and (2) that it “contains matter which constitutes a legal justification or excuse”. The demurrer was overruled. Thereafter defendant was tried, found guilty and sentenced to the state prison at Florence for not less than eleven months and twenty-nine days and not more than twelve months.
He has appealed and complains that it was error to overrule his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Irwin v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Burrell v. Capt. H. A. Crow Post No. 884California Court of Appeal · 1929
- State v. HosmerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Crane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Tracy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Portonova v. WilkinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Roscoe v. SchoolitzArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Todd v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Roscoe v. SchoolitzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969