Legal Opinion

Ross v. State of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1939No. Criminal No. 881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

— On December 16, 1938 the defendant was informed ag-ainst by the County Attorney of Maricopa County for criminal libel. He demurred to the information on the grounds (1) that it “does not state facts sufficient to constitute a criminal charge” and (2) that it “contains matter which constitutes a legal justification or excuse”. The demurrer was overruled. Thereafter defendant was tried, found guilty and sentenced to the state prison at Florence for not less than eleven months and twenty-nine days and not more than twelve months.

He has appealed and complains that it was error to overrule his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Irwin v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Burrell v. Capt. H. A. Crow Post No. 884California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. State v. HosmerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Crane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Tracy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Portonova v. WilkinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Roscoe v. SchoolitzArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Todd v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Roscoe v. SchoolitzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API