Legal Opinion

Current v. HADDONS FENCING, INC.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 2011No. 37740PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

This case comes before us on an appeal by Dennis B. Current (Current) from the Idaho Industrial Commission’s (Commission) denial of unemployment benefits. Current argues that the Commission erred in finding that he willfully made a false statement and in failing to call one of his witnesses. The Department of Labor (the Department) argues the Commission’s findings are supported by substantial and competent evidence and should be upheld.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Current worked for Haddons Fencing, Inc. (Haddons Fencing) as a shop foreman from June 10, 2008,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lee v. NickersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. McGilvery v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Ewins v. Allied SecurityIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Higgins v. Larry Miller Subaru-MitsubishiIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bringman v. New Albertsons, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Waite v. Moto One KTM, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Billy J. Bringman v. New Albertsons, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Bringman v. New Albertsons, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API