Legal Opinion

Ewins v. Allied Security

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2003No. 28152PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This case comes before the Court following the Industrial Commission’s denial of Nina Ewins’ request for unemployment compensation benefits. Ewins left a position with Allied Security for a job with higher pay at Thornton Oliver Keller. Her new position ended after about a month. Thereafter, she applied for unemployment benefits. The Industrial Commission found that Ewins had voluntarily quit her job with Allied Security without good cause in connection with the employment and was not entitled to unemployment benefits. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Nina Ewins began…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jensen v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Burroughs v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Pyeatt v. Idaho State UniversityIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Burnside v. Gate City Steel Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Teevan v. Office of Attorney General, Natural Resources Division, State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McNulty v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Edwards v. Independence Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Arel v. T & L ENTERPRISES, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Thrall v. St. Luke's Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API