Bringman v. New Albertsons, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
SCHROEDER, Justice Pro tern,
dissenting.
The Court follows straight line analysis which in most instances leads to the proper *79and just result. However, in this case straight line analysis is akin to a survey using a compass directing to magnetic north! The starting point follows a logical line, but the result is an end many degrees off true north. A correction was necessary to get to the proper end. That is the situation in this case. The decision of the Commission is based in substantial part on conjecture without underlying facts and disregard for uncontroverted evidence favorable to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Ewins v. Allied SecurityIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Cox v. Hollow Leg Pub and BreweryIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Buckham v. Idaho Elk's Rehabilitation HospitalIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.