Legal Opinion
Michael Tankersley v. James Almand
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 13, 2016No. 15-1081PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING joined. Senior Judge DAVIS wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
DIAZ, Circuit Judge:
All attorneys licensed in Maryland who are not permanently retired must pay an annual fee to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland. In addition to paying the fee, Maryland attorneys must also disclose their social security numbers to the Fund. Relying on federal law, the Court of Appeals of Maryland enacted this particular mandate in support- of the state’s efforts to collect back taxes and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marlon Hall v. DIRECTV, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States ex rel. Carson v. Manor Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Jacob Doe v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversitCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- Burkhart v. MorinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
- Juber v. ConklinDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.