Legal Opinion

Thorsness v. Daschle

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1979No. 12645-12652, 12657, 12658, 12660, 12663 and 12679Published

1Opinion of the Court

279 N.W.2d 166 (1979)

Leo K. THORSNESS, Plaintiff,

v.

Thomas DASCHLE, Defendant.

Nos. 12645-12652, 12657, 12658, 12660, 12663 and 12679.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued February 9, 1979.

Decided May 30, 1979.

Steve Jorgensen, of Willy, Pruitt, Matthews & Jorgensen, Sioux Falls, for plaintiff.

Lawrence L. Piersol, of Davenport, Evans, Hurwitz & Smith, Sioux Falls, for defendant; Michael L. Luce, Sioux Falls, on the brief.

HENDERSON, Justice (on reassignment).

Upon the motion of Leo K. Thorsness (Thorsness) we issued a writ of certiorari for the purpose of reviewing matters concerning the election…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Roudebush v. HartkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gammage v. ComptonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Thorsness v. DaschleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API