Legal Opinion

Gammage v. Compton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1977No. B-6542PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL, Justice.

This is a mandamus proceeding which arises out of a suit filed by Ron Paul against Robert Alton Gammage in the 151st Judicial District Court seeking to contest the election in which Gammage has been declared to be the winner over Paul for Congressman for the 22nd Congressional District of Texas.

Relator Gammage seeks to have this Court mandamus the Respondent, Honorable John L. Compton, Judge of said Court, to vacate certain orders relating to further deposing of Gammage by counsel for Respondent Paul, to grant such further relief as the Court deems requisite and proper, *2and to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roudebush v. HartkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Barry v. United States Ex Rel. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. McLeod v. State Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Laxalt v. CannonNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Burchell v. State Board of Election CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tapley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  2. Feehan v. MarconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  3. Thorsness v. DaschleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Feehan v. MarconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  5. Feehan v. MarconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API