Legal Opinion

Purdy v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 25, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARROTT, Presiding Judge.

Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company has appealed from the circuit judge’s (sitting without a jury) finding its homeowners policy issued to Earnest Douglas Purdy afforded coverage for four wheels and tires stolen from the insured’s yard.

The single assignment insists the circuit judge erred in holding the insurance company liable under the homeowner’s policy for the theft loss of the four tires and wheels.

There is little or no dispute as to the facts. It is stipulated the policy was in force and contained a $100.00 deductible clause. It is further…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Brown v. Tennessee Auto Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Dressler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
  4. Swindler v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  5. American Employers Insurance v. Knox-Tenn Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lineberry v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1995
  2. Rankin Ex Rel. Rankin v. Generali—U.S. BranchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. Blevins v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. TN Farmers v. Roger HostetlerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API