Legal Opinion

Lyman v. New England Newspaper Publishing Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 23, 1934PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

These are two actions for libel. The plaintiffs are husband and wife. Save as to names, the declarations are substantially identical except that there is an allegation of special damages in that of the husband. Each declaration states the name and residence of the plaintiff and the marriage existing between the two plaintiffs. The declarations state that the defendant is a corporation which publishes and circulates throughout the Commonwealth a newspaper which usually contains, among other matters, a column of tattle under the caption “‘beacon hill’ by Betty Alden”; that on July 19, 1933, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peck v. Tribune Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Commonwealth v. ClapMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  3. Morasse v. BrochuMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Twombly v. MonroeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Merrill v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Duane P. Brasslett v. Raymond J. Cota, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Renfro Drug Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. McAvoy v. ShufrinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Sharratt v. Housing Innovations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Muchnick v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API