Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Foster Cathead Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1982No. 2264PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

This is a writ of garnishment proceeding brought by appellee Foster Cathead Company (Foster Cathead) against appellee Park-dale Bank (the Bank) to acquire funds held by the latter in the name of Dynamic Oilfield Maintenance Company, Inc. (Dynamic), a judgment debtor of Foster Cathead. Appellant Comptroller of Public Accounts intervened, asserting an interest in the funds sought to be garnished by way of a written assignment of the savings account in which the funds are maintained. In a trial to the court judgment was for Foster Cathead. We are of the opinion that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. BrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Beggs v. FiteTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Central Nat. Bank v. Latham & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. McAllen State Bank v. Texas Bank & Trust CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Tracy v. Stock Assurance BureauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Asai v. Vanco Insulation Abatement, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
  2. Smith v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  3. Industrial Disposal Supply Co. v. Perryman Bros. Trash Service, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983
  4. Sims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Ho v. Wolfe, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API