Legal Opinion

Central Nat. Bank v. Latham & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 14, 1929No. 845PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, C. J.

This appeal is prosecuted by Central National Bank, represented and acting herein by its liquidating committee, but hereinafter called hank, and J. M. Smith, hereinafter called by name, from a judgment awarding the sum of $1,588.35 in the hands of the Gulf, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Company, garnishee herein, to Latham & Co., garnishing creditors of Early-Foster Company, judgment debtor. Said Latham & Co. will be hereinafter called ap-pellees.

The record is complicated. No purpose could be served by reciting the same in detail. Judge Sam. R. Scott and W. M. Foster also were parties to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fievel v. ZuberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Goldfrank, Frank & Co. v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Goggin v. State Nat. Bank of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Hudson v. WilkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Russell v. People's Nat. Bank of BeltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. CA PARTNERS v. Spears, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. Sam Bassett Lumber Co. v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Clyde AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Corpus Christi People's Baptist Church, Inc. v. Nueces County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Pape Equipment Co. v. I.C.S., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API