Legal Opinion

Seney v. Knight

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1920No. Nos. 12752-12753PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the First Branch Appellate Court for the First District; — heard in that court on appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. John H. Williams, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

Appellants, Edgar F. Seney and Rowland T. Rogers, petitioned the county court of Cook county praying release from imprisonment under writs of capias ad satisfaciendum issued from the municipal court in an action of the first class for the recovery of damages for the conversion of personal property. Appellants contended that malice was' not the gist of the action in said cause and that they were entitled to release under the Insolvent Debtors act. Upon a hearing the county court found that malice was the gist of the action in which the writs were issued, and thereupon 'remanded the petitioners…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jernberg v. MixIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Kitson v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Chudnovski v. EckelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Knight v. SeneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Kellar, Ettinger & Fink v. NortonIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Greener v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  2. In Re Petition of BlacklidgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Lipman v. GoebelIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Fetz v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  5. Stoike v. BonaseraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API