Legal Opinion

Knight v. Seney

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1919No. 12289PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Writ or Error to the Second Branch Appellate Court for the First District; — heard in that court on writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

In an action of trover in the municipal court of Chicago, James H. Knight, as administrator of the estate of Adele Knight, deceased, recovered against Edgar F. Seney and Rowland T. Rogers, a partnership doing business as Seney, Rogers & Co., a judgment for $62,319.76 for the conversion of certain securities for the payment of money. Seney, Rogers & Co. prosecuted a writ of error from the Appellate Court, which found that there was no error in the record except that the amount of the verdict was excessive, and proceeded to correct this error by deducting $24,066.53. The judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mercantile Trust Co. v. KastorIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Wolf v. BeairdIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. City of Spring Valley v. Spring Valley Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. North Chicago Street Railroad v. WrixonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Bettis v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Haid v. TingleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Seney v. KnightIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Western States Mutual Insurance v. VerucchiIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Foster v. Augustanna College & Theological SeminarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API