State v. $44,140.00 United States Currency
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Bryen Birkholz appeals from a judgment ordering him to forfeit $44,140 in currency seized during a search of his residence and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Birkholz argues the district court erred in applying the presumptions in N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23.3 to currency he claims was seized under the authority of N.D.C.C. § 29-31.1-03. He also claims there was insufficient evidence of a transaction to justify a forfeiture of the currency under N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23.3(l)(d) and the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial on the ground of newly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. RydbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Hogan v. HoganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Keyes v. AmundsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. OsierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Paulson v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- KLE Construction, LLC v. Twalker Development, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Mead v. HatzenbellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. GrensteinerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. HorningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Dickinson v. HelgesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.