Legal Opinion

Dighton v. Coffman

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided August 31, 1959No. 1648-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLATT, Chief Judge.

This cause was remanded to the Review Committee on June 30, 1959 for more full and complete findings of fact and conclusions, for the reason that “the Review Committee failed to make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions therefrom setting forth the reasons or basis therefor upon which this court [could] determine whether or not the Review Committee found there was a substantial change in the crop-rotation on the plaintiff’s farm to bring him within the regulation § 728.917(c) (iv) 1 and that the regulation was properly applied.” On August 10,1959, the Review Committee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Crolley v. TattonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Dighton v. CoffmanDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Junghans v. Department of Human Resources of District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Williamson v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1963
  3. Henry Timmons Dighton v. James Coffman, as the Review Committee for Piatt County, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  4. Howard v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API