Legal Opinion

United States v. DiTomasso

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 22, 2010No. 08-2567PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), Pub.L. No. 109-248, tit. I, §§ 101-155, 120 Stat. 587, 590-611 (2006), fashioned a national scheme for the registration of sex offenders. This appeal requires us to decide a question about that scheme that has divided the courts of appeals: When did SORNA’s registration requirements become operative with respect to a previously convicted sex offender who traveled interstate and failed to register between SORNA’s effective date and the promulgation of an inter*19im rule clarifying SORNA’s reach? After determining…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. United States v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Tasker v. DHL Retirement Savings PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API