Legal Opinion

Murray-Obertein v. Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 23, 2018No. A17A1836PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Presiding Judge.

Elisabeth Murray-Obertein appeals from the order of the trial court granting the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission's ("the Commission") motion for summary judgment. Murray-Obertein contends that the trial court erred in finding that her retaliation claim under the Georgia Whistleblower Act, OCGA § 45-1-4 et seq (the "GWA"), was precluded because she was not an "employee" at the time of the Commission's purported retaliatory acts. Upon our review, we affirm.

On appeal from the grant of summary judgment, this court applies a de novo standard…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Deal v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  3. Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Colon v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  5. West v. City of AlbanySupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Pitts.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  2. Anton I. Baptiste v. Dekalb County Sheriff, Jeffrey L. Mann, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
  3. City of Pendergrass v. Katherine RintoulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  4. Mark A. Thompson v. Dekalb County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
  5. Musson v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API