Legal Opinion

Michael J. Cozy, Inc. v. Smith

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 13, 1965No. File No. CV 4-6309-2251Published

1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.

The complaint contained two counts, the first of which alleged that the defendant owed the plaintiff a debt by book to balance book accounts, which debt remained wholly unpaid. Practice Book, Form No. 9. It is a statutory form of action founded on book accounts. Terrill v. Beecher, 9 Conn. 344, 348; Words and Phrases, “Book Debt — Action of.” This was followed by a bill of particulars before the defendant was required to answer; Practice Book § 153; and conformed with the rule set down in Reiley v. Torkomian, 78 Conn. 645, 649. Assumpsit is a concurrent remedy, and consequently there has been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Freda v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Johnson v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Skovronski v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Remington v. NobleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API