Legal Opinion

Riegel v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1869No. 138PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill county: No. 138, to January Term 1869. This was an action of assumpsit brought, December 1st 1865, by John Riegel and Stephen Riegel, trading as Riegel & Brother, against John J. Wagner and R. C. Wilson. The writ was served on Wilson and returned “ nihil” as to Wagner.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill county: No. 138, to January Term 1869. This was an action of assumpsit brought, December 1st 1865, by John Riegel and Stephen Riegel, trading as Riegel & Brother, against John J. Wagner and R. C. Wilson. The writ was served on Wilson and returned “ nihil” as to Wagner. The cause of action was a promissory note, dated July 5th 1865, from Wagner and Wilson to Riegel & Brother, payable in four months, for $851.28. On the 16th of January 1866, judgment was entered by order of the court against Wilson for default of appearance, and damages assessed…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered,

by

Sharswood, J.

It will be best to consider the several assignments of error in this case in their order.

The 1st is to the admission of the deposition of Henry Lindemuth. There had been a judgment by default for want of appearance, and on a rule to show cause why that judgment should not be opened, the deposition in question had been taken ex parte, but on due notice. This court has already decided that depositions taken on such a rule are admissible on the trial when *392the witness is dead: Haupt et al. v. Henninger, 1 Wright 138. Here the witness was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HayTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Scott v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  3. Zerger v. SailerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. DaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Michigan Ammonia Works v. EllkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Markell v. Lang Machine Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1972
  4. Nace v. Neff College of OratorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API