Legal Opinion

Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 27, 2012No. Case No. C10-1823JLRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation’s (“Microsoft”) motion for partial summary judgment (Mot. (Dkt. # 77)). The court has reviewed Microsoft’s motion, Defendants Motorola, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc., and General Instrument Corporation’s (collectively, “Motorola”) response (Resp. (Dkt. # 90)), Microsoft’s reply (Reply (Dkt. # 96)), all other pertinent documents in the record, and the relevant law. For the reasons set forth below, the court *995GRANTS in part…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Dredge Corp. v. PennyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Houston v. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Wm. Dickson Co. v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cordoves v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  2. Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
  3. Realtek Semiconductor Corp. v. LSI Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  4. Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
  5. In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC Patent LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API