Legal Opinion

Kenneth J. Haugen v. Rochelle Brosseau Puyallup Police Department the City of Puyallup

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2003No. 01-35954PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge WILLIAM A. FLETCHER; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge GOULD

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

This court’s opinion, filed August 4, 2003, [339 F.3d 857] is amended as follows:

1. The fifth sentence in the full paragraph on slip op. 10604 [339 F.3d at 868] that reads:

“Brosseau had not called Subido and Pashon to assist her, and there is no indication that they were running to give her aid.” is deleted.

2. The second sentence in the first full paragraph on slip op. 10608 [339 F.3d at 870] that now reads:

“But because officers can…

Also in this document: Dissent.

Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Chelsey Hayes v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
Blanford v. Sacramento CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
Bradford v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2008
C.B. v. Sonora School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
Rabinovitz v. City of L. A.District Court, C.D. California · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.