Legal Opinion

State v. Wakeford

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1998No. 97-067PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶ 1 Daniel Allan Wakeford was charged by information on June 27, 1995, with the offenses of criminal possession of dangerous drugs, a felony, and misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia. Wakeford filed a motion to suppress physical evidence found after a warrantless search of his motel room. The Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, denied the motion. Wakeford entered into a plea agreement with the State in which he agreed to plead guilty to the charge of felony criminal possession of dangerous drugs and the State agreed to dismiss the misdemeanor possession of drug…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. ElisonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. HardawayMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. GomezMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. SaxtonMontana Supreme Court · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API