Legal Opinion

Fredericka Home for the Aged v. Southern Trust & Commerce Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 1923No. Civ. No. 4333PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

In addition to leaving a will, concerning the authenticity of which no question is made, the decedent left behind her certain written matter which was by the trial court admitted to probate as a codicil to the will. Frederieka Home for the Aged was a beneficiary under the. will, but the bequest to that institution was revoked by the alleged codicil, if it shall be determined that the trial court properly admitted it to probate. The Zoological Society of San Diego and the San Diego County Hospital are named as beneficiaries in the codicil. The Fredericka Home appeals from the order of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ManchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In Re the Estate of McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Shoults v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Estate of MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Atkinson v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Estate of FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Treaster v. HamlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API