Legal Opinion
Salvador Reza v. Russell Pearce
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 18, 2015No. 13-15154PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Opinion by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge WALLACE.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Smith and Watford voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wallace so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on en banc rehearing. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(f). The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. The court’s opinion and the dissent filed August 18, 2015, and appearing…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- City and County of San Francisco v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Taylor v. BarkesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Eng v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Charles M. Grossman, M.D. v. City of Portland, a Public Body, and Todd DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Victoria Zetwick v. County of YoloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Barna v. Board of School Directors of the Panther Valley School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Dillon Bracken v. Kinchung ChungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Walsh v. EngeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Eberhardt v. Village of Tinley ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 2024
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.