Legal Opinion
Eng v. Cooley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2009No. 07-56055PublishedCited by 310 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
We must determine whether Steve Cooley, Steven Sowders, Curt Livesay, Anthony Patchett, and Curtis Hazell (collectively, the “Defendants”) are entitled in their individual capacities to qualified immunity in this § 1983 First Amendment retaliation case. 1 Resolving this question involves, in part, David Eng’s claim that he was retaliated against by the Defendants for an interview given by his lawyer on his behalf to the press. Concluding that we lack jurisdiction to address whether Eng has third party standing to vindicate the constitutional rights of his…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by310 opinions
- Bryan v. MacPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- George v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Angelo Dahlia v. Omar RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- John Ellins v. City of Sierra MadreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Robinson v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
305 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.