Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Henard

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1977PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this malpractice action in order to clarify the practice and procedure in the use of motions for summary judgment under Rule 56, Tenn.R. Civ.P. in medical malpractice actions. More specifically, we address the issue of the propriety of dismissing a medical malpractice action on the basis of opinion evidence as contained in affidavits of medical doctors. 1 This is a question of first impression in this jurisdiction.

The trial judge sustained motions for summary judgment and his action was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.

We affirm.

I

Petitioner’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Evco Corporation v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Teeters v. CurreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Rural Educational Association v. BushCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  4. John S. Elliott and Fredda Caldwell Elliott v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. St. Martin v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Michelle RYE Et Al. v. WOMEN’S CARE CENTER OF MEMPHIS, MPLLC Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Webb v. Nashville Area Habitat for Humanity, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Bayberry Associates v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Downen v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API