Legal Opinion

Gardiner v. Kennelly

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 28, 1952No. M. P. No. 992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This appeal was taken under the provisions of public laws 1949, chapter 2174, sec. 31, by a telephone subscriber, hereinafter called the appellant, from an order of the public utility' administrator, referred to herein as the administrator, permitting the New England Telephone & Telegraph Company, termed the company, to place into effect a certain schedule of rates and charges.

In this court, motions to dismiss the appeal were filed respectively by the company and by the administrator. These motions are based on several grounds, among them being the claim that appellant is not a proper person…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tillinghast v. Brown UniversitySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1902
  2. Attleboro Steam & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1925
  3. Gannon v. DoyleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1890
  4. Interstate Transit Corp. v. Division of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Providence Gas Company v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  2. City of Houston v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Bristol & Warren Gas Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API