Legal Opinion

Keszenheimer v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 2, 2005No. 04-60043PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we must decide whether a plan administrator properly interpreted an insurance policy to exclude from the disability benefit calculation an employee’s offshore per diem and automobile allowance. The district court held that the administrator’s interpretation was in error. We reverse and render judgment.

I

Edward P. Keszenheimer, Jr., filed a pro se complaint for damages against Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (“Reliance”) and Weatherford International pursuant in part to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 1 alleging that he was covered by a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Wegner v. Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Abshire v. County of KernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Custer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Chacko v. Sabre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Burton v. Banta Global Turnkey Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  4. Dunn v. Ge Group Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. Estate of Thompson v. Sun Life Assurance Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API