Legal Opinion
Milgrim v. Deluca
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 12, 1985No. 12029PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment awarding damages for breach of a written contract for removal of gravel and other material from land owned by the plaintiffs. The principal issue raised is whether an earlier dismissal, pursuant to Practice Book, 1963, § 191A1 of a suit upon the same cause of *193action because of failure to prosecute with reasonable diligence bars the present action under the doctrine of res judicata. We conclude that such a dismissal in our practice does not have this consequence. The defendant also claims that the court used an incorrect price in computing the damages…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morris v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cecio Bros., Inc. v. FeldmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Jones Destruction, Inc. v. UpjohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Pacelli Bros. Transportation, Inc. v. PacelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Nor'easter Group, Inc. v. Colossale Concrete, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Rawling v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Ruddock v. BurrowesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.