Pulver v. Dundee Cement Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentRiley, J.
I respectfully dissent. While the majority’s opinion has much to recommend it, I am *84troubled over the fact that it does not take adequate account of what I believe to be an overriding policy of worker’s compensation law, to wit: an employee’s good-faith duty to accept reasonable offers of favored work.
As this Court has clearly recognized, the legislative amendments of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act in the last decade were intended to narrow eligibility qualifications.
[W]e believe that our decision today is consistent with the intent of the Legislature manifested by its reform…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Bower v. Whitehall Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Dean v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Carter v. Lakey Foundry Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.