Legal Opinion
United States v. Dominic Alaimo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 19, 1962No. 13614_1PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
The appellant was convicted 1 for violation of 29 U.S.C.A. § 186(b), (d), commonly known as the Taft-Hartley Act. Subsection (b) of the statute provides:
“(b) It shall be unlawful for any representative of any employees who are employed in an industry affecting commerce to receive or accept, or to agree to receive or accept, from the employer of such employees any money or other thing of value.”
Subsection (d) labels the forbidden conduct a misdemeanor and provides for a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.
The Government…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Eugene Boffa, Sr., Robert Boffa, Sr., Louis S. Kalmar, Sr., and Chandler LemonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Cyrus T. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Gerardo A. Re, A/K/A Jerry A. Re, Gerard F. Re, Charles A. Casagrande, A/K/A Charles A. Grande and Ely BatkinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. BoffaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- United States v. Constantine "Gus" Karas, United States of America v. Joseph Nicholas PecoraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.