Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Farrier

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 31, 1985No. 83-1635PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice.

We granted further review in this controversy to clarify the appropriate standard of judicial review in appeals from prison disciplinary committees. On appeal, petitioner Elbert Wilson asserted the district court wrongfully denied him postconviction relief when it found there was sufficient evidence to support the committee’s determination that petitioner was guilty of a rule infraction. The court of appeals reversed the district court ruling on the ground the record did not disclose “substantial evidence” to support the committee’s decision. We hold it is sufficient…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Ponte v. RealSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Michael Hanrahan v. Michael P. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Sanford v. ManternachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Giles v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. Reilly v. Iowa District Court for Henry CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. Dykstra v. Iowa District Court for Jones CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. Maghee v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API