Smita Radhakrishnan v. Access Therapies, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing Jan 21 2014, 10:12 am the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: JAMES E. AYERS BRYCE H. BENNETT, JR. Wernle, Ristine & Ayers BRANDON J. ALMAS Crawfordsville, Indiana Riley Bennett & Egloff, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA . SMITA RADHAKRISHNAN, ) ) Appellant-Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 49A02-1303-PL-202 )…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harrison v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Briles v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- McCauley v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. WhitemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Dunson v. DunsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.