Legal Opinion

Miehlich v. Tintic Standard Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1922No. 3730PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, C. J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant pursuant to section 2326, Rev. St. U. S. (U. S. Comp. St. § 4623), to determine the right of possession to certain conflict dreas arising out of locations of mineral lands situate in Tintie mining district, Utah county, state of Utah. The plaintiffs claim the right of possession to the ground embraced within the exterior boundaries of their alleged Eagle, Black Eagle, and Black Eagle No. 1 lode mining .claims, while the defendant claims the right to the possession of the ground within the exterior boundaries of its alleged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Chambers v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Nevada Exploration & Mining Co. v. SpriggsUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Mann v. BudlongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meagher v. Uintah Gas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lucky Five Mining Co. v. Central Idaho Placer Gold Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Silliman v. PowellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Utah Standard Mining Co. v. Tintic Indian Chief Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Meagher v. Uintah Gas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API